Keep Legal in Control of Regulatory Risk Without Drowning in the Monitoring
RegSpace does the watching, gap-analysis and first-draft work across EU AI Act, GDPR and DORA, then hands you source-linked draft intelligence to review. Your counsel reviews and decides; the judgement and the sign-off stay with you.
This page is for General Counsel and Heads of Legal who own regulatory risk oversight and need to stay on top of fast-moving rules without expanding headcount. RegSpace handles the groundwork (monitoring the regulators, scoring your policies against the law, drafting redlines and intelligence digests) and leaves the legal judgement, the review and the decision firmly with your team. Every digest item is source-linked and every output is a draft for your qualified counsel to review, not legal advice.
What slows General Counsel teams down
Too many regulators, too little signal
Tracking the EU AI Act rollout, GDPR and UK GDPR developments, DORA technical standards and US state privacy laws across EU, UK, US federal and priority states is more than any small legal function can read every week. The change that matters gets lost in the noise, and you find out late.
You are accountable but you cannot see the whole estate
The board looks to you for regulatory risk oversight, yet the picture lives in scattered spreadsheets, inboxes and policy documents nobody has reconciled. You are signing off on a position you cannot fully evidence.
AI-drafted output you cannot trust or trace
Generic AI tools produce confident regulatory summaries with no citation, no audit trail and a habit of overreaching. You will not put your name behind anything you cannot trace back to the actual source.
Reviewing intelligence eats the time you need for judgement
By the time you have manually pulled the source, mapped a change to the affected policy and marked up a redline, the week is gone. The drafting groundwork crowds out the legal thinking only you can do.
Proving you did the work, after the fact
When a regulator, auditor or board member asks what you knew and when, you need a defensible record of what was flagged, who reviewed it and what was decided, not a reconstruction from memory and email threads.
Fear that automation will quietly replace counsel judgement
You want leverage, not a black box that auto-applies changes or files things on your behalf. The decision rights, the privilege and the professional judgement have to stay with qualified people.
How RegSpace helps
RegSpace does the monitoring, drafting, and gap-analysis groundwork. You review and decide. Not legal advice.
The Watcher weekly-monitors the regulators and legislative trackers that actually touch your business across EU, UK, US federal and priority states (CA, CO, IL, MA, NY, TX) and Australia, then drafts a digest of changes where every item links to its source. It is draft regulatory intelligence for your counsel to read and decide on, never a final legal conclusion.
When a monitored change hits a policy you have published, the Watcher produces a DOCX redline with track-changes proposing the edit. Nothing is auto-applied: your team accepts, rejects or rewrites every change, so the drafting is done for you but the judgement is yours.
The Assessor scores your uploaded policies against the law and corpus and shows where you stand as missing, partial or covered with a score. It gives you an evidenced view of where the documentation falls short before a regulator or auditor finds it, so you can prioritise the legal review that matters.
The Profiler builds your compliance profile by crawling your website and classifying your policies, giving your counsel an editable starting point rather than a blank page. Your team reviews and edits it, so the profile the rest of the work hangs off is one Legal has signed off.
The GRC Workspace holds your registers (RoPA and processing activities, a risk register with a 5x5 matrix, controls, incidents, DPIAs, cookies, assets, vendors) plus a review and approval workflow, tickets and dashboards. It records who reviewed what and what was decided, so you can show your oversight rather than reconstruct it.
The Privacy Inspector toolkit scores vendor and third-party risk and reconciles your published privacy notice against the underlying registers, surfacing mismatches for your team to resolve. It supports the due-diligence and accuracy duties that sit under GDPR and DORA third-party expectations.
Regulations on your radar
FAQ
Does RegSpace give legal advice or replace our counsel?
No. RegSpace produces draft regulatory intelligence, gap analysis and policy redlines for your qualified counsel to review and decide on. It does the monitoring and drafting groundwork; it does not form a lawyer-client relationship, provide legal advice, or replace the judgement of your legal team.
Can I trust the regulatory intelligence enough to put my name behind it?
Every digest item the Watcher drafts is source-linked back to the regulator or legislative tracker it came from, so your team can verify each change against the primary source before acting. The output is a reviewable draft, not a sealed conclusion, which is what makes it defensible.
Will RegSpace auto-apply policy changes or file anything with a regulator?
No. Proposed policy edits arrive as DOCX track-changes redlines that your team accepts, rejects or rewrites; nothing is auto-applied. RegSpace does not file anything with a regulator and does not guarantee compliance. The decisions and submissions stay with you.
Which regulations and jurisdictions does it cover for a GC?
Monitoring spans the EU, UK, US federal and priority states (CA, CO, IL, MA, NY, TX) and Australia. For General Counsel the highest-value hubs are usually the EU AI Act, GDPR (and UK GDPR) and DORA, with the Watcher tuned to the regulators and trackers that actually touch your business.
How does RegSpace help me evidence oversight to the board or an auditor?
The GRC Workspace keeps your registers, a review and approval workflow, tickets and dashboards, recording who reviewed each item and what was decided. Combined with the Assessor's scored gap view, it lets you show a defensible record of your regulatory risk oversight rather than reconstructing it after the fact.
How is this different from a generic AI summarising regulations?
RegSpace is grounded in your published policies and your compliance profile, every change is source-linked, redlines are proposed not applied, and the work is captured in an auditable review workflow. It is built so counsel stays in control of the judgement, not so a model makes the call for you.
See RegSpace for General Counsel teams.
Cited weekly intelligence, policy gap analysis, and the registers your role runs on, in one place.